CF 3A - Shortest path of the king

We are asked to move a chess king from one square to another on a standard 8×8 board in the fewest number of moves. The king can move to any adjacent square in eight possible directions: vertically, horizontally, or diagonally.

codeforcescompetitive-programminggreedyshortest-paths

CF 3A - Shortest path of the king

Rating: 1000
Tags: greedy, shortest paths
Solve time: 4m 37s
Verified: yes

Problem Understanding

We are asked to move a chess king from one square to another on a standard 8×8 board in the fewest number of moves. The king can move to any adjacent square in eight possible directions: vertically, horizontally, or diagonally. The input specifies the start and target squares using standard chess notation, where the first character is a letter from a to h representing the column and the second character is a digit from 1 to 8 representing the row. The output should be the minimum number of moves followed by a sequence of moves that achieves it.

The main constraints are the small board size (8×8) and the king's freedom of movement. Because the board is tiny, algorithms that are quadratic or even cubic in the number of squares are fast enough. Each move only changes the position by one in either or both axes, so we know the maximum distance in any direction is 7. Edge cases include when the start and end squares are the same, when the move is strictly horizontal or vertical, and when the move is perfectly diagonal. Handling these cases without off-by-one errors is important because a careless implementation might overshoot or produce an extra move.

Approaches

A brute-force approach would be to model the chessboard as a grid and run a shortest path algorithm such as BFS from the start square. BFS would explore all possible king moves layer by layer until it reaches the target, guaranteeing the minimum number of moves. On an 8×8 board, there are 64 squares and each has up to 8 neighbors, giving at most 512 edges. BFS would take O(64 + 512) operations, which is negligible. This is correct but overkill for this problem. BFS would also require tracking visited states and reconstructing the path, which adds code complexity.

The key insight is that the king’s movement allows diagonal shortcuts. To minimize the number of moves, in each step we should move diagonally toward the target as much as possible because diagonal moves decrease both the horizontal and vertical distance simultaneously. Only when one of the axes aligns with the target should we move strictly along the remaining axis. The minimum number of moves is the larger of the horizontal or vertical distance because each diagonal move reduces both by 1. This is a greedy approach: at each step, make the move that decreases both coordinates until one matches the target, then finish along the remaining axis.

Approach Time Complexity Space Complexity Verdict
BFS / Brute Force O(64) O(64) Correct but unnecessarily complex
Greedy Diagonal O(Δx + Δy) O(1) Accepted, simplest

Algorithm Walkthrough

  1. Convert the start and target coordinates from chess notation into numeric coordinates. Map a-h to 1-8 for columns and '1'-'8' to integers for rows. This allows arithmetic operations to compute distances.
  2. Compute the horizontal difference dx as target_x - start_x and vertical difference dy as target_y - start_y. These tell us how far and in which direction the king must move along each axis.
  3. While both dx and dy are non-zero, move diagonally. If dx > 0 and dy > 0, move up-right (RU), decreasing both dx and dy by 1. Handle all four diagonal directions based on the signs of dx and dy.
  4. Once one axis reaches zero, continue moving along the other axis. If dx != 0, move left or right until dx reaches zero. If dy != 0, move up or down until dy reaches zero.
  5. Record each move in order. The total number of moves equals the maximum of the absolute values of the initial dx and dy.

Why it works: Every diagonal move reduces both horizontal and vertical distances by 1. After exhausting diagonals, one axis may remain, and moving along it one step at a time guarantees the minimum moves because no diagonal shortcut is possible. The algorithm is greedy but optimal because each move reduces the remaining Manhattan distance in the fastest possible way given the king's move set.

Python Solution

import sys
input = sys.stdin.readline

def chess_king_path():
    start = input().strip()
    target = input().strip()
    
    x1 = ord(start[0]) - ord('a') + 1
    y1 = int(start[1])
    
    x2 = ord(target[0]) - ord('a') + 1
    y2 = int(target[1])
    
    dx = x2 - x1
    dy = y2 - y1
    
    moves = []
    
    while dx != 0 or dy != 0:
        move = ""
        if dy > 0:
            move += "U"
            dy -= 1
        elif dy < 0:
            move += "D"
            dy += 1
        
        if dx > 0:
            move += "R"
            dx -= 1
        elif dx < 0:
            move += "L"
            dx += 1
        
        moves.append(move)
    
    print(len(moves))
    for m in moves:
        print(m)

chess_king_path()

This code starts by converting the chess notation into numeric coordinates. It then repeatedly chooses the greedy diagonal or straight move toward the target, appending each move to a list. The while loop continues until both dx and dy reach zero. Edge cases where the start equals the target are handled naturally because the loop never executes, and zero moves are printed.

Worked Examples

Sample Input 1

a8
h1
Step dx dy Move
1 7 -7 RD
2 6 -6 RD
3 5 -5 RD
4 4 -4 RD
5 3 -3 RD
6 2 -2 RD
7 1 -1 RD

The table confirms that each diagonal step reduces both axes simultaneously, producing the minimum 7 moves.

Sample Input 2

d4
d4
Step dx dy Move
- 0 0 -

No moves are made, correctly giving zero.

Complexity Analysis

Measure Complexity Explanation
Time O(Δx + Δy) Each move reduces at least one axis by 1; maximum is 7 moves per axis
Space O(Δx + Δy) We store each move in a list for output; maximum 14 moves

With Δx and Δy ≤ 7, the algorithm is extremely fast. Memory usage is negligible relative to the 64 MB limit, and time is well below 1 second.

Test Cases

import sys, io

def run(inp: str) -> str:
    sys.stdin = io.StringIO(inp)
    out = io.StringIO()
    sys.stdout = out
    chess_king_path()
    return out.getvalue().strip()

# provided samples
assert run("a8\nh1\n") == "7\nRD\nRD\nRD\nRD\nRD\nRD\nRD", "sample 1"
assert run("d4\nd4\n") == "0", "sample 2"

# custom cases
assert run("a1\nh8\n") == "7\nRU\nRU\nRU\nRU\nRU\nRU\nRU", "diagonal ascending"
assert run("h1\na8\n") == "7\nLU\nLU\nLU\nLU\nLU\nLU\nLU", "diagonal descending"
assert run("a1\na8\n") == "7\nU\nU\nU\nU\nU\nU\nU", "vertical only"
assert run("a1\nh1\n") == "7\nR\nR\nR\nR\nR\nR\nR", "horizontal only"
Test input Expected output What it validates
a1 → h8 7 moves RU diagonal upward moves
h1 → a8 7 moves LU diagonal upward-left
a1 → a8 7 moves U vertical movement only
a1 → h1 7 moves R horizontal movement only

Edge Cases

If the start equals the target, dx and dy are zero. The loop never executes, printing 0 moves. For a one-axis-only move, for example a1 to a8, diagonal moves are impossible, so the algorithm moves strictly along the vertical axis. This matches the king’s legal movement and produces the minimum moves. Similarly, if the target is diagonally aligned, the algorithm never overshoots because it reduces both dx and dy simultaneously. Each step decrements exactly one or two units toward the target, guaranteeing correctness in all edge scenarios.