CF 233B - Non-square Equation
This is a Type B - “Prove that / determine a value” problem. The task is to deduce a uniquely determined numerical quantity from the hypotheses.
Rating: 1400
Tags: binary search, brute force, math
Solve time: 49s
Verified: no
Solution
Problem-Type Check
This is a Type B - “Prove that / determine a value” problem. The task is to deduce a uniquely determined numerical quantity from the hypotheses.
The proof must therefore show that the given conditions force a unique value for the number of students who solved only problem $B$, and that the derived value is consistent with all conditions.
The proposed solution does this: it derives a system of equations from the hypotheses, solves the resulting Diophantine equation, and obtains a unique value $b=6$. No additional existence construction is strictly required because the argument derives the value directly from the hypotheses and the intermediate variables remain nonnegative integers.
Step-by-Step Verification
Step 1: Definition of variables $a,b,c,d,e,f,g$ for the seven Venn-diagram regions - VALID
The partition of the contestants into the seven mutually exclusive regions is correct and exhaustive.
Step 2: Total count
$$a+b+c+d+e+f+g=25$$
- VALID
This follows directly from the partition and the statement that every student solved at least one problem.
Step 3: Translation of the “did not solve $A$” condition into
$$b+f=2(c+f)$$
and hence
$$b=2c+f$$
- VALID
Among students outside $A$, the $B$-solvers are exactly the regions $b,f$, while the $C$-solvers are exactly $c,f$. The algebraic rearrangement is correct.
As a quick parity/divisibility sanity test:
If $c=1,f=0$, then $b=2$, and indeed $b+f=2$, $c+f=1$, satisfying the condition.
If $c=2,f=2$, then $b=6$, and indeed $b+f=8$, $c+f=4$.
Step 4: Translation of the “half of the one-problem solvers did not solve $A$” condition into
$$b+c=\frac{a+b+c}{2}$$
and hence
$$a=b+c$$
- VALID
The one-problem solvers are exactly $a,b,c$, and among them those not solving $A$ are precisely $b,c$. The algebra is correct:
$$2(b+c)=a+b+c \implies a=b+c.$$
Check with small values:
If $a=4,b=3,c=1$, then exactly half of the one-problem solvers avoid $A$:
$$b+c=4,\quad a+b+c=8.$$
Step 5: Translation of the “only $A$” condition into
$$a=d+e+g+1$$
- VALID
Students solving $A$ together with at least one other problem are exactly the regions $d,e,g$.
Step 6: Deduction
$$d+e+g=b+c-1$$
from Steps 4 and 5 - VALID
Substituting $a=b+c$ into $a=d+e+g+1$ gives the claimed relation.
Step 7: Substitution into the total count to derive
$$26=3(b+c)+f$$
- VALID
The substitution is:
$$25=(b+c)+b+c+(b+c-1)+f.$$
Combining terms:
$$25=3(b+c)+f-1,$$
hence
$$26=3(b+c)+f.$$
The arithmetic is correct.
Step 8: Substituting $b=2c+f$ into the previous equation to obtain
$$26=9c+4f$$
- VALID
Indeed,
$$26=3((2c+f)+c)+f=3(3c+f)+f=9c+4f.$$
Step 9: Solving the Diophantine equation by congruences:
$$9c+4f=26$$
implies
$$4f\equiv 8 \pmod 9$$
and therefore
$$f\equiv 2\pmod 9$$
- VALID
Since $4^{-1}\equiv 7 \pmod 9$,
$$f\equiv 7\cdot 8=56\equiv 2\pmod 9.$$
Step 10: Using $0\le f\le 6$ to conclude $f=2$, then $c=2$, then $b=6$ - VALID
From $9c+4f=26$,
$$4f\le 26 \implies f\le 6.$$
Among integers $0,\dots,6$, only $2$ is congruent to $2\pmod 9$.
Then:
$$9c+8=26 \implies 9c=18 \implies c=2,$$
and
$$b=2c+f=4+2=6.$$
Step 11: Implicit consistency of the obtained values with all constraints - VALID
From the derived relations:
$$a=b+c=8,$$
$$d+e+g=a-1=7.$$
Since only the sum $d+e+g$ matters, one may choose for example
$$(d,e,g)=(7,0,0),$$
which keeps all variables nonnegative.
Checking all conditions:
Total:
$$8+6+2+7+0+2+0=25.$$
Outside $A$:
$$b+f=6+2=8,\quad c+f=2+2=4.$$
Only-$A$ versus mixed-$A$:
$$8=7+1.$$
Exactly one problem:
$$a+b+c=16,\quad b+c=8.$$
Everything is consistent.
Completeness Check
The proof handles all variables and all hypotheses.
No cases are omitted. The integrality condition is properly used. The final conclusion follows directly from the proved system.
The exploratory section contains an intentionally incorrect intermediate computation producing $25/3$, but the author explicitly identifies and corrects the algebraic mistake. Since the final proof section is logically independent and correct, this does not invalidate the solution.
No hidden assumptions remain unjustified.
Summary
The proof is logically correct and complete. Every condition is translated accurately into algebraic relations, the eliminations are valid, and the Diophantine equation is solved rigorously. The obtained value $b=6$ is uniquely forced and consistent with the original hypotheses.
VERDICT: PASS - the proof is complete and all steps are correctly justified.